Official product information
One claim on the bottle, four more on the sales page, what each is allowed to mean — and a plain list of what these capsules are not made to do.
Written and reviewed by the SodaPeak Editorial Desk · Last updated September 22, 2026
Quick answer
The bottle carries one health claim: “Supports Healthy Muscle*”, with an asterisk leading to the FDA footnote. The sales page adds four lines — stamina, energy, strength and vitality; immune support; focus support; overall wellness. All five are structure/function claims, the only kind of health claim a supplement may print. None carries a number, and no trial of this formula exists.
The label
One health claim is printed on this bottle. It sits inside a red roundel on the front, around a horse’s head: “SUPPORTS HEALTHY MUSCLE*”
That is the whole of it. Not stronger muscle, not more muscle, not faster recovery: a claim that the product supports something, with an asterisk pointing at a footnote saying the statement has not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration.
No measurement, no outcome, no timescale, no comparison. It does not say how much muscle, whose, or measured against what, and a claim with no number in it cannot be checked.
Because that is the kind of claim a supplement may make. US law allows a structure/function claim, provided it carries the FDA disclaimer; a claim about treating or preventing a disease belongs to medicines. So the modesty of the sentence is not restraint by this brand. It is the ceiling, and every competing bottle works under the same one.
Claims
Quoted from the supplied material, word for word, and read one at a time.
Four words set as a row. Each is a structure/function claim in its own right and none is attached to a number or a measurement. Read the row as a description of the shelf rather than four promises.
Immune support does not appear on the bottle itself. Neither ingredient here with a research record has an immune finding attached to it in our sources.
Focus support likewise appears on the sales page rather than the label. Nothing in the supplied material connects any of the eight ingredients to attention or cognition.
About as broad as a claim can be while remaining one. It names no structure and no function, so there is nothing in it to check.
The regulated surface carries a single narrow claim about muscle; the unregulated surface carries four more. Nothing about that is unlawful and it is standard in this category. It is also the shape to watch for: the further a claim sits from the bottle, the broader it tends to get.
Plain English
“Supports” does a great deal of work here and on every other label in the category, so it is worth being precise about what it may mean.
A structure/function claim describes an effect on the normal structure or function of the body. “Supports healthy muscle” is one; so is the familiar “calcium builds strong bones”.
Not a statement that anything was measured in anybody. Not a claim that the product improves a function, only that it supports one. And not a claim about a condition: “supports healthy muscle” and “treats muscle loss” are different categories of statement, and only the first may appear here.
Treat “supports” as naming the aisle rather than describing the result. The gap between “supports healthy muscle” and “builds muscle” is where most of the disappointment in this category is manufactured. Nobody printed the second sentence; it still gets read.
The honest section
The blend on the panel is called the Test Boost Proprietary Blend. It is the most suggestive phrase on the packaging, and it is not a claim.
Claims are regulated; names are not, in the same way. That makes a blend name the one place on a label where a product can gesture at something its claims may not say, and “Test Boost” gestures unmistakably at testosterone.
Look at what the label does with it, though. No printed claim on this bottle mentions a hormone, and a claim of that kind would not be permitted on a dietary supplement.
The same bottle carries “ADVANCED FORMULA” under the wordmark, and nothing we were given says what is advanced about it. Both phrases are marketing attached to a product rather than descriptions of it.
MedlinePlus describes hormones as the body’s chemical messengers, travelling in the bloodstream to tissues or organs, and notes that too much or too little of a certain hormone can be serious. If you believe a hormone of yours is off, that belongs with a clinician and a blood test.
The honest section
It does not build muscle on its own. It does not raise testosterone. It does not treat low testosterone or any other condition. It is not a substitute for training, sleep or food, and it is not FDA approved, because no dietary supplement is. Nothing on the label claims any of that, and neither will we.
NIH’s Office of Dietary Supplements sets the frame for this category, and two of its sentences belong on any page selling one of these products.
The first: “Performance supplements cannot substitute for a healthy diet.”
The second: “Only a few dietary supplements have enough scientific evidence showing that they can improve certain types of exercise and athletic performance.” Nothing in this bottle is among them.
The Office of Dietary Supplements states there is no scientific support for taking Tribulus terrestris supplements to improve exercise or athletic performance, and says the same of DHEA and deer antler velvet. None is in this product. We quote them because they are the ingredients this category is usually sold on.
The same page notes that the FDA warns some products marketed as dietary supplements to improve exercise and athletic performance might contain inappropriate, unlabeled or unlawful stimulants, steroids, hormone-like ingredients, controlled substances, prescription medications or unapproved drugs, and that using tainted products can cause health problems. The FDA separately maintains a public notification list for sexual enhancement and energy products, and is explicit that it covers only a small fraction of the contaminated products on the market. No laboratory report has been published here, so neither warning can be checked against this bottle.
Evidence
Setting the marketing aside, here is what a buyer can be told about the contents of this bottle, in descending order of how well established it is.
Nothing, for this formula. There is no trial of the blend.
NCCIH’s digest on benign prostatic hyperplasia reports that stinging nettle produced significant improvement in International Prostate Symptom Score, maximum urinary flow rate and relief of lower urinary tract symptoms compared with placebo, over six months. That is urinary symptoms, not muscle.
NCCIH reports that a recent comprehensive review determined saw palmetto, administered alone, provides little or no benefit for BPH symptoms, and that there is not enough evidence to determine whether it is useful for other health purposes. That is the best-studied ingredient in the formula.
Boron. The Office of Dietary Supplements calls it a mineral in many foods and says experts have not set a recommended amount.
Horny goat weed, tongkat ali, wild yam, sarsaparilla and orchic substance: five of the eight, with no federal consumer page between them.
It is. A benefits page carrying only the claims is an advertisement with a heading on it.
The gaps
The counterweight to the five claims above, in the same plain terms.
There is none. No printed claim carries a measurement, a timescale or a comparison.
None. The seller’s listing summary says most buyers waited three to six weeks, which describes expectation rather than effect.
None. Every source on this site is about a single ingredient.
Not knowable. No individual amount is published.
None in our sources, for any of the eight, despite two of the sales-page lines.
None on the label, and none permitted. The blend’s name is not a claim.
No clinician is named in the supplied material, which is why we treat the doctor-formulated seal as marketing.
None published. The lot and certificate codes have no document behind them.
Neither list cancels the other: the claims are real, lawful and printed, and so are the blanks. If you do buy, write down before you start which one thing you would want to be different in four weeks, in a sentence specific enough to be wrong. The week-by-week plan →
Straight answer
A printed 1200 mg blend total, six species in binomial form, six plant parts and a full other-ingredients line are real disclosure, and plenty of competing bottles publish less. If what you want is a daily botanical habit from a seller with a phone line that answers, that is what is on offer.
If the appeal is the word “Test”, or the dumbbell in the photograph, then the label does not claim it and the evidence does not support it. We would rather say so and lose the sale. If what you want is more muscle, keep the Office of Dietary Supplements’ sentence: performance supplements cannot substitute for a healthy diet. Who this product suits →
Questions
No supplement builds muscle on its own, and none is claimed to here - the label says “supports healthy muscle”, which is a different sentence. NIH’s Office of Dietary Supplements puts it plainly: performance supplements cannot substitute for a healthy diet, and only a few have enough scientific evidence showing they can improve exercise and athletic performance.
Nothing on this label claims that. The blend is named a Test Boost blend, which points at testosterone, but every printed claim on the bottle is a structure/function claim about muscle, and US law would not allow a hormone claim. NIH’s Office of Dietary Supplements finds no scientific support for the ingredients usually sold on that promise.
No dietary supplement is. The FDA is not authorised to approve supplements for safety and effectiveness before they are sold. A seal reading “FDA-registered facility” describes a factory’s registration, not this product.
No timeline is published by the seller as a policy, and no trial of this formula exists. The seller’s own listing summary says most buyers waited three to six weeks. At two capsules a day, four weeks is most of a bottle, which makes it the natural first checkpoint.
Because five of the eight named buyers in the material supplied to us say the same sentence word for word, down to the phone number inside it, and two more share a second. The seller’s own published figures are on our reviews page, labelled as the seller’s, and nothing is presented as testimony.
References
Next
Eight ingredients in four pairs, and the three things nobody can tell you.
Read it →What is published for one of the eight, and what is not for the rest.
Read it →Three kinds of buyer it fits and four it plainly does not.
Read it →One printed claim, eight named ingredients and a 1200 mg blend total. Read the section on what it does not do before you decide. Order desk +1 (302) 200-3480.
Price and money-back window on the listing · ships from inside the US · order desk +1 (302) 200-3480