Official product information
SodaPeak is a dietary supplement sold as a capsule, 60 capsules to a black bottle, distributed by Vitalifes. The Supplement Facts panel prints a serving of 2 capsules, 30 servings a bottle and a 1200 mg Test Boost Proprietary Blend. That panel names eight ingredients; every marketing image names six. No individual amount is published, the capsule shell is gelatin, and no pack price was supplied to us, so every price here reads “at checkout”.
Sold by Sodapeakcare, USA Authorized Retailer · Order desk +1 (302) 200-3480 · Read the whole panel
Marks describe the packaging. They are not an endorsement, and no supplement
is FDA approved. What each one means
The short version
Twenty-three rows, every one of them read off the bottle or the seller’s own pack. Where a figure does not exist, the row says so — and where the label and the box disagree, both are printed.
SodaPeak in 60 seconds
SodaPeak is a dietary supplement sold as a capsule, 60 capsules to a black bottle, distributed by Vitalifes. The Supplement Facts panel prints a serving size of 2 capsules, 30 servings a bottle and a 1200 mg Test Boost Proprietary Blend containing horny goat weed extract, tongkat ali powder, saw palmetto extract, nettle extract, wild yam extract, sarsaparilla, orchic substance and boron amino acid chelate. That is eight ingredients; the seller’s pack and both listing cards name only the first six. The bottle directs one or two capsules daily with an 8 oz. glass of water. No individual ingredient amount is published. The capsule shell is gelatin and the blend contains an animal-derived glandular ingredient, so the vegetarian seal on the packaging is not supported by the label. No pack price was supplied, so prices show at checkout, and no money-back window length is published anywhere in our sources.
1200 mg blend. 60 capsules a bottle. Eight ingredients named on the label. Pack prices and the money-back window are on the listing, not here, because neither was supplied to us.
See the three packsThe honest section
A vegetarian seal appears in the packaging artwork supplied with this product. The label itself says otherwise, twice over. The Other Ingredients line ends “Gelatin Capsule”, and gelatin is made from animal collagen. The blend itself contains Orchic Substance, which is glandular tissue of animal origin. Neither of those is a borderline case, and neither is hidden: both are printed on the panel in plain sight.
If you avoid animal-derived ingredients, this product is not for you, and the seal on the box is wrong. The label wins, and on this point the label is unusually easy to read.
Gelatin is made by boiling animal collagen, usually from cattle or pig hide and bone. It is the ordinary material for a capsule shell and there is nothing unusual about a supplement using it. What is unusual is a vegetarian seal on the same packaging.
Orchic substance is the second problem and the less familiar one. It is a glandular ingredient: animal tissue, dried and powdered. The label does not name the animal, the part or the process, and it is the seventh of the eight ingredients in the blend — which also means it is present in a larger share than the boron beneath it.
We have no way of knowing whether the seal was applied by mistake or by habit. What we can tell you is which document to believe. The Supplement Facts panel is the regulated label; a seal in a marketing image is not. Every seal on this packaging, explained →
The product
SodaPeak is a capsule supplement. It arrives as 60 capsules in a black bottle with a gold-ruled label, under the Vitalifes brand mark.
The front of the bottle carries the maker’s mark, a circular red seal reading “SUPPORTS HEALTHY MUSCLE*” around a horse’s head, the wordmark SodaPeak, the line ADVANCED FORMULA, the count 60 capsule and the words DIETARY SUPPLEMENTS.
Turn it round and there is a full Supplement Facts panel: serving size 2 capsules, servings per container 30, and a 1200 mg Test Boost Proprietary Blend with eight ingredients listed under it. Turn it again and the third panel prints the suggested use, the storage note, the caution, the safety-seal warning, the distributor line and an expiry date of 07-2028.
Two sentences this site exists to say clearly. The first: 1200 mg is the total for the whole proprietary blend, not the amount of each ingredient. The second: the panel names eight ingredients and every piece of marketing names six.
The honest section
The bottle’s Supplement Facts panel names eight ingredients inside the blend. The seller’s product pack names six. The “Inside SodaPeak” card names six. The “How SodaPeak Works” card names the same six. Orchic Substance and Boron Amino Acid Chelate appear only on the label. The label is the regulated document, so both are published here, on every list, in the order the panel prints them.
Neither omission is trivial. Orchic substance is animal-derived, which is the fact behind the vegetarian problem above, and it sits seventh of eight — so it is present in a larger share than the boron below it. Boron amino acid chelate is the only mineral in a formula otherwise sold as botanical, and NIH’s Office of Dietary Supplements publishes an upper limit for boron that you cannot check this product against, because no amount is printed.
The rule we apply, here and on every page: the Supplement Facts panel is the regulated label, and a card in a listing is an advertisement. Where they disagree, we publish the label. The longer version is in the blog →
Buying here
Six reasons, and the last two are the reason to trust the first four.
Sodapeakcare describes itself as a USA Authorized Retailer. Note the wording: it does not name the brand it is authorised for, which is looser than this category usually prints, and we tell you that rather than tidying it.
+1 (302) 200-3480, for orders, tracking, changes and refunds. Most supplement sites in this category publish a web form and nothing else.
31-00 47th Avenue, Suite 2100, Long Island City, NY 11101, USA. It is on this site rather than behind a support ticket, and it is a different address from the office, which is normal and worth knowing before you post anything.
[email protected], Monday to Friday, 9:00am - 5:00pm ET. It handles this site: corrections, privacy and press. It cannot see orders, and we say so rather than letting you wait.
Not in a footnote. A site that sells this product and buries the vegetarian problem and the missing two ingredients is not information, it is advertising with a disclaimer attached.
Five of the eight named buyers in the material we were given say the same sentence word for word, down to the phone number inside it. We publish the seller’s figures as the seller’s, and no testimony.
Mechanism
Eight steps. Seven of them are real, and the eighth is the one the word “proprietary” makes impossible.
The label asks for an 8 oz. glass, and that is part of the instruction rather than decoration: a capsule needs enough water to clear the throat and open in the stomach rather than higher up.
1200 mg of proprietary blend across horny goat weed, tongkat ali, saw palmetto, nettle root, wild yam, sarsaparilla, orchic substance and boron. The panel lists them in descending order by weight, which is the one thing a proprietary blend still tells you: horny goat weed is the largest share and boron the smallest.
Horny goat weed and tongkat ali. Both have long records of traditional use and neither appears in NCCIH’s Herbs at a Glance index, which covers about fifty-six herbs. That absence means there is no federal plain-language summary to read, not that anything is known to be wrong with them.
Saw palmetto and nettle root. These are the two with research records, and the records are about urinary symptoms rather than muscle. NCCIH’s digest on benign prostatic hyperplasia reports stinging nettle produced significant improvement in symptom scores and urinary flow over six months compared with placebo.
NCCIH reports that a recent comprehensive review determined saw palmetto, administered alone, provides little or no benefit for BPH symptoms, and that there is not enough evidence to determine whether it is useful for other health purposes. That is the best-studied thing in this bottle.
Wild yam and sarsaparilla. Both are traditional tonic roots, both are named with a species, and neither has a federal consumer page. We cite none for them rather than reaching for a source we have not read.
Orchic substance, which is animal glandular tissue, and boron amino acid chelate, which is a mineral. NIH’s Office of Dietary Supplements says experts have not set a recommended amount of boron and that scientists are studying whether it affects health. Its page says nothing about muscle.
Working out whether 1200 mg is enough of anything. It is a large total for this category, and it is still one number shared eight ways with no split published. Two unknowns stack on top of each other here.
We are not going to describe a mechanism for SodaPeak in the body, because no study of this formula exists and the ingredient split is not published. Read this section as a map of what the formula is built from, not as a claim about what it does for you — and not as a suggestion that it changes a hormone level, which the label does not claim and we will not either.
The formula
Eight named on the label, in the order the Supplement Facts panel prints them, which is descending order by weight.
Horny goat weed extract
First in the blend, and the one the category is built on.
Horny goat weed is a group of flowering plants in the genus Epimedium, used in traditional Chinese practice. This label names the species and prints the plant part, which is more than most labels in this category manage.
It is the ingredient that signals what the product is for. NCCIH’s Herbs at a Glance index covers about fifty-six herbs and horny goat weed is not among them, so there is no federal plain-language summary to point you at. Traditional use is real and long; controlled human research in the United States is thin.
Amount in SodaPeak: not published Research reference: No agreed research dose
Tongkat ali powder
The second traditional name, and a powder rather than an extract.
Tongkat ali is a shrub-tree from Southeast Asia. Note the wording on this panel: it is the only one of the six botanicals described as a <em>powder</em> rather than an <em>extract</em>, which usually means ground root rather than a concentrate.
It is a fixture of this category worldwide. It is not in NCCIH’s Herbs at a Glance index either, so the same caveat applies: long traditional use, no federal consumer summary.
Amount in SodaPeak: not published Research reference: No agreed research dose
Saw palmetto extract
The only ingredient here with a proper federal page - and the finding on it is not flattering.
NCCIH describes saw palmetto as “a small tree that grows to a height of 6 to 10 feet”, native to the West Indies and the southeast coast of North America. The fruit is the part used, and this label says so.
This is the ingredient a buyer can actually check, and the check is worth doing. NCCIH reports that a recent comprehensive review determined saw palmetto, administered alone, “provides little or no benefit for BPH symptoms”, and that there is not enough evidence to determine whether it is useful for other health purposes.
Amount in SodaPeak: not published Research reference: Trials use standardised extract; no amount is agreed for other uses
Nettle extract
The second ingredient with a research record, and the root rather than the leaf.
Stinging nettle is a common perennial. The root and the leaf are used for different things, and this label specifies the root, which is the part the prostate research uses.
NCCIH’s research digest on benign prostatic hyperplasia reports that stinging nettle produced “significant improvement in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), maximum urinary flow rate, and relief of lower urinary tract symptoms compared with placebo, over 6 months of treatment”. Note what that is about: urinary symptoms, not muscle.
Amount in SodaPeak: not published Research reference: Trials in the digest ran over six months
Wild yam extract
A root vegetable with a long history of being misdescribed.
Wild yam is a climbing vine whose tuber is used in traditional practice. The species named here, Dioscorea opposita, is the Chinese yam rather than the Mexican species usually sold under the same English name.
It appears in a great many men’s and women’s formulas. It is not in NCCIH’s Herbs at a Glance index, and no federal consumer page covers it, so this site cites none for it.
Amount in SodaPeak: not published Research reference: No agreed research dose
Sarsaparilla
The sixth botanical, and the last one any marketing image mentions.
Sarsaparilla is a climbing vine; the root is the part used, and the label specifies it. The species named is the Chinese sarsaparilla.
It is a traditional tonic root rather than an ingredient with a modern evidence file. Not in NCCIH’s Herbs at a Glance index.
Amount in SodaPeak: not published Research reference: No agreed research dose
Orchic substance
Seventh on the panel, and named in no marketing image at all.
Orchic substance is glandular tissue of animal origin, used in supplements as a so-called glandular ingredient. The label does not say which animal, which part, or how it was processed.
It belongs in two conversations at once. The first is evidence: no federal consumer page covers it, and this site cites none. The second is disclosure: an animal-derived ingredient sits directly against the vegetarian seal in this product’s own packaging artwork.
Amount in SodaPeak: not published Research reference: No agreed research dose
Boron amino acid chelate
Eighth on the panel, the only mineral, and named in no marketing image.
NIH’s Office of Dietary Supplements describes boron simply as “a mineral in many foods”. An amino acid chelate is a delivery form rather than a different substance.
It is the only non-botanical in the blend. The Office of Dietary Supplements is direct about what is known: “Experts haven’t set a recommended amount of boron”, and “scientists are studying boron to understand whether it affects health”. Its page carries nothing at all about muscle, performance or hormones.
Amount in SodaPeak: not published Research reference: No recommended intake has been set
Tap any ingredient to open it. Every card ends the same way, because the panel ends the same way. Read the full ingredient page →
The honest section
SodaPeak publishes more than most of this category does — a real Supplement Facts panel, a declared 1200 mg total, six botanical species named in binomial form and a plant part for six of the eight. What it does not publish is how that total divides. So a dose-versus-research comparison can be made for the blend as a whole, and cannot be made for any single ingredient in it.
| What | Amount in SodaPeak | Research reference | Our reading |
|---|---|---|---|
| The whole proprietary blend | 1200 mg a serving | Eight ingredients share it | This is the only amount published anywhere on the bottle. |
| Horny goat weed extract (leaf) | not published | No agreed research dose | Not in NCCIH’s Herbs at a Glance index. |
| Tongkat ali powder (root) | not published | No agreed research dose | A powder rather than an extract, per the panel’s own wording. |
| Saw palmetto extract (fruit) | not published | Trials use a standardised extract | NCCIH: little or no benefit for BPH symptoms when given alone. |
| Nettle extract (root) | not published | Trials ran over six months | The research is about urinary symptoms, not muscle. |
| Wild yam extract (root) | not published | No agreed research dose | No federal consumer page covers it. |
| Sarsaparilla (root) | not published | No agreed research dose | No federal consumer page covers it. |
| Orchic substance | not published | No agreed research dose | Animal-derived. Named in no marketing image. |
| Boron amino acid chelate | not published | No recommended intake has been set; adult upper limit 20 mg a day | No amount published, so you cannot check it against the limit. |
Two things make this blend harder to size up than the arithmetic suggests. The first is the dosing range: the label allows one capsule or two, and the 1200 mg figure only describes the two-capsule serving. Take one and you are taking 600 mg of blend, and the number on the front of every summary no longer describes what is in your hand.
The second is that two of the eight are not botanicals. A blend total that mixes six plant extracts with a glandular ingredient and a mineral is harder to reason about than one made of the same kind of thing throughout, and the descending-order rule is the only guide you get.
That is not an accusation. Plenty of formulas are built to be a daily habit rather than a clinical dose, and the label never claims otherwise — it says supports, and it carries the FDA footnote. It does mean you should buy this as a habit, not as a strength.
The label
Four lines, eight ingredients, seven other ingredients — and nine things that are not there.
SodaPeak prints a full Supplement Facts panel. Here it is, transcribed off the bottle shot supplied in the assets.
Other Ingredients: Calcium Carbonate, Microcrystalline Cellulose, Sodium Starch Glycolate, Stearic Acid, Magnesium Stearate, Silicon Dioxide, Gelatin Capsule.
Distributed by : Vitalifes · Expiry date: 07-2028
The footnote is printed “Dally Value Not Established”. Printed exactly like that, with “Dally” for “Daily”. There is a second, subtler slip beside it: the blend row carries a double asterisk while the footnote below carries a single one, so the marker on the row has no matching footnote and the footnote has no matching marker.
“Gelatin Capsule”, at the end of the other-ingredients list. It is the last three words on the panel and the most consequential, because a vegetarian seal sits on the same packaging.
Claims
One claim on the bottle, five lines on the sales page, and then the list most pages in this category leave out.
The claim inside the roundel on the front of the bottle, with the asterisk that ties it to the FDA footnote. “Supports” is the modest, legal wording for a supplement. Note what it does not say: it does not name a measurement, an outcome or a hormone.
Four words from the sales page, set as a row. Each is a structure/function claim on its own and none of them is tied to a number. Read them as what the formula is offered for rather than what it delivers.
Two more from the sales page. Neither appears on the bottle itself, and neither of the two ingredients here with research records has an immune or cognitive finding attached to it in the sources we read.
About as broad as a claim can be while still being one. It is the sentence a label reaches for when it has run out of specific things to say, and it is worth exactly as much as that suggests.
Quoted from the material supplied to us. All five are structure/function claims, which is what US law permits a supplement to say.
It does not build muscle on its own, raise testosterone, treat low testosterone, or improve athletic performance — and nothing on this label claims it does. The blend is called a Test Boost blend, which points at hormones; its printed claims do not, and US law would not allow them to. NIH’s Office of Dietary Supplements states plainly that performance supplements cannot substitute for a healthy diet and that only a few have enough scientific evidence showing they can improve exercise and athletic performance. It is not FDA approved, because no dietary supplement is. It has no published timeline and no trial of its own.
The honest section
Eight each. The right-hand column is the one worth reading twice.
Fit
This label rewards that, and punishes the opposite. Six species in full, six plant parts and a declared 1200 mg total are all on the bottle. Two whole ingredients, and the gelatin capsule, are on the bottle and nowhere else.
1200 mg is a big number for this category, and it is printed. Most competing labels either print nothing or print a figure a tenth the size.
A US order desk, a published office and a separate returns address in Long Island City. Being able to stop is worth something in a category this noisy.
This is the clearest exclusion on the list. The capsule shell is gelatin and the blend contains orchic substance, which is animal glandular tissue. The vegetarian seal on the packaging is wrong, and we would rather you knew that from us than from the panel after it arrived.
The blend is called a Test Boost blend. No printed claim on this label mentions hormones, and US law would not allow one. NIH’s Office of Dietary Supplements is blunt about the ingredients usually sold on that promise: there is no scientific support for Tribulus terrestris, DHEA or deer antler velvet for exercise or athletic performance.
Two of the eight ingredients have research records in benign prostatic hyperplasia, which is a diagnosis rather than a feeling. If that is what you are dealing with, a clinician will do more than a capsule, and one of the two ingredients has a federal page reporting little or no benefit when given alone.
The bottle’s own caution names pregnant and nursing mothers and children under 18. NCCIH adds that saw palmetto may be unsafe during pregnancy or while breastfeeding.
Daily routine
Six steps, and the first one is a decision rather than an action.
The label allows either. Two is the serving the 1200 mg figure describes and makes the bottle a 30-day supply; one is half of both. Pick one, write it down, and stay with it, because drifting between them makes the next eight weeks unreadable.
The label asks for 8 oz. specifically. A capsule taken dry can lodge in the oesophagus, and two capsules at once need more water than one.
No time of day is published. Attach it to something you already do without deciding — the first coffee, or breakfast — because consistency is the only variable you actually control here.
The bottle prints this itself. With eight ingredients in unknown proportions, taking more is not a controlled experiment; it is a guess stacked on a guess.
The label’s own storage line, plus “store in a cool, dry place”. A bathroom cabinet is humid by design and is the worst place in the house for it.
The side panel prints 07-2028. Six bottles at one capsule a day is a long time; check the date on the bottles you actually receive before you commit to a large pack.
Take the next day’s as normal. Do not double up to catch up. There is no loading dose here and nothing to make up.
Format
One form only. SodaPeak is a capsule, 60 capsules to a black bottle. There is no liquid, powder or chewable version in the material we were given, and no larger or smaller bottle.
Three things follow from that. The first is that a capsule is a fixed amount. Unlike a dropper or a scoop, you cannot take slightly too much by accident — which makes the label’s one-or-two range the only variable, and the reason it matters that you decide it once rather than daily.
The second is that the shell is part of the ingredient list, and on this product it is the part that decides whether you can take it at all. Gelatin is animal-derived. A vegetarian alternative exists — HPMC, a plant cellulose — and this product does not use it.
The third is that the other-ingredients line is ordinary and readable. Calcium carbonate, microcrystalline cellulose, sodium starch glycolate, stearic acid, magnesium stearate and silicon dioxide are the standard fillers, flow agents and disintegrants of capsule manufacturing. None of them is alarming and all of them are printed, which is more than some labels manage.
If you want the longer version of the capsule-shell argument, it is in the blog.
Category
| What you are comparing | SodaPeak | Typical of the category |
|---|---|---|
| Form | SodaPeak: capsule | Most muscle-support supplements: capsule |
| Serving size printed | Yes - 2 capsules | Usually yes |
| Directions printed | Yes, but as a range: one or two capsules | Usually a fixed dose |
| Bottle arithmetic | Checks out - 60 capsules at 2 a serving is 30 servings | Rarely worth checking |
| Blend total published | Yes - 1200 mg | Often not published at all |
| Individual amounts | No - “Proprietary Blend” | Varies - the better labels publish a full panel |
| Species named | Yes, for six of eight | Sometimes |
| Plant part named | Yes, for six of eight | Often not |
| Label and marketing agree | No - eight on the label, six in the marketing | Usually, at least on the ingredient list |
| Vegetarian claim supported | No - the label prints gelatin and orchic substance | Usually supported or not claimed |
| Third-party test published | No - reference codes only | Uncommon, but the best labels publish one |
| Money-back window | Length not published | 30 to 90 days |
| Published price | None - shown at checkout | Usually published |
| Phone support | Yes, +1 (302) 200-3480 | Often email only |
| Row | What it means for a buyer |
|---|---|
| Form | The ordinary form for this category, with the ordinary trade-off: easy to dose, harder to swallow than a chewable. |
| Serving size printed | An ordinary label line, and it is here. |
| Directions printed | A range means the strength you take and the cost per day both move. |
| Bottle arithmetic | When a label’s numbers agree with each other, somebody read it before it printed. |
| Blend total published | SodaPeak is ahead of the category here, and 1200 mg is a large figure. |
| Individual amounts | This is where the panel stops being useful. |
| Species named | Six binomials printed in full is genuinely good disclosure. |
| Plant part named | Leaf, root, fruit, root, root, root. The two that have none are not plants. |
| Label and marketing agree | Two ingredients appear in no image, no card and no pack. |
| Vegetarian claim supported | The clearest contradiction on this product, and the easiest to check. |
| Third-party test published | A code is not a document. |
| Money-back window | “Often the marketplace return window” is a pointer, not a policy. |
| Published price | The weakest part of the buying experience here. |
| Phone support | A real strength. |
The pattern across fourteen rows: SodaPeak’s label is unusually good — a declared 1200 mg total, six binomials, six plant parts, a printed expiry date — and its paperwork around the label is unusually bad. Two ingredients missing from every image, a vegetarian seal the panel contradicts, no price and no window length. That is an odd shape, and it is the shape a buyer should know about before paying.
Packs
Three pack sizes. No price, because none was supplied to us — and a guessed price you are then charged something else for is worse than none.
Smallest pack
60 capsules · 30 servings
30 days at two capsules a day
Most ordered, per the seller
180 capsules · 90 servings
90 days at two capsules a day
Largest pack
360 capsules · 180 servings
180 days at two capsules a day
No pack price was supplied to us, so every price on this site reads “shown at checkout”. The figure you will actually be charged is printed on the marketplace listing, and that is the only place it appears. We would rather say that than estimate a number.
The honest section
| Pack | Bottles | Capsules | Servings | Days at 2 a day | Days at 1 a day | Cost a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Single bottle | 1 | 60 | 30 | 30 | 60 | at checkout |
| Three-bottle pack | 3 | 180 | 90 | 90 | 180 | at checkout |
| Six-bottle pack | 6 | 360 | 180 | 180 | 360 | at checkout |
The single bottle. At two capsules a day it is one month, which is long enough to know whether a daily capsule survives contact with your actual life, and short enough that you are not sitting on five unopened bottles inside a refund window whose length nobody has published.
The six-bottle pack is 360 capsules. At one capsule a day that is nearly a year of product against an expiry date of 07-2028 and a window of unknown length. If the product suits you, the larger pack is still there in a month. The saving does not expire; the window does, and you cannot currently see when.
Notice what is missing from that table. One column depends on a price no page publishes before checkout, and two more depend on a dosing decision the label leaves entirely to you. Those are three ordinary lines, and none of them is settled.
The arithmetic that is available is clean, and worth saying out loud: 60 capsules at two a serving is exactly 30 servings, which is what the panel declares. When a label’s own numbers agree with each other, somebody checked it before it printed.
Safety
| If this applies… | Because of… | What to do |
|---|---|---|
| You avoid animal-derived ingredients | Gelatin capsule, orchic substance | This product is not for you. Both are printed on the panel, and the vegetarian seal on the packaging is not supported by it. |
| You take an iron supplement | Nettle | NCCIH notes nettle contains tannins that can reduce the effectiveness of an iron supplement. Space them apart and mention it to a pharmacist. |
| You are pregnant or breastfeeding | Saw palmetto, and the whole formula | NCCIH says saw palmetto may be unsafe during pregnancy or while breastfeeding. The bottle’s own caution names pregnant and nursing mothers before anyone else. |
| You are under 18 | The whole formula | The label is explicit. Children under the age of 18 should consult a physician before using this or any dietary supplement. |
| You have urinary or prostate symptoms | Saw palmetto, nettle root | These two have research records in benign prostatic hyperplasia, which is a diagnosis rather than a feeling. See a clinician rather than self-treating with a blend that does not publish its amounts. |
| You take any regular medicine | Six of the eight ingredients | Six have no federal consumer page, which means no published interaction summary exists. Read the eight-ingredient list out to a pharmacist; it takes them under a minute. |
| You have any known medical condition | The formula as a whole | The bottle’s own instruction: individuals with a known medical condition should consult a physician before using this or any dietary supplement. |
Of the eight ingredients in this formula, exactly one — saw palmetto — has a federal consumer page. NCCIH’s Herbs at a Glance index covers about fifty-six herbs and horny goat weed, tongkat ali, nettle, wild yam and sarsaparilla are not among them. Orchic substance and boron are not herbs at all.
That does not mean those seven are dangerous. It means no plain-language federal summary exists for them, so a page like this one cannot tell you what is known about their interactions, because nobody has written it down in a place we are willing to cite.
NCCIH says saw palmetto is well tolerated and that adverse effects are mild and infrequent, and may include digestive symptoms, dizziness and headache; it adds that saw palmetto does not appear to affect readings of prostate-specific antigen levels, and that it may be unsafe for use during pregnancy or while breastfeeding. On nettle, NCCIH’s BPH digest says it is generally well tolerated and may produce mild gastrointestinal effects.
That is the whole of the published safety information for this formula’s ingredients. No side effects are published for the product itself.
NIH’s Office of Dietary Supplements states that the FDA warns some products marketed as dietary supplements to improve exercise and athletic performance might contain inappropriate, unlabeled or unlawful stimulants, steroids, hormone-like ingredients, controlled substances, prescription medications or unapproved drugs, and that using tainted products can cause health problems. NCCIH makes a similar point about supplements sold for bodybuilding and sexual enhancement. No laboratory report has been published for this product, so neither warning can be checked against it either way.
Anything you notice is worth reporting to the order desk on +1 (302) 200-3480 and to your own clinician. Read the full safety page →
Expectations
Days 1-7
Before anything else, decide whether you are taking one capsule or two and write it down. The label allows either, and the 1200 mg figure only describes the two-capsule serving. Drifting between them makes the next seven weeks unreadable.
Nothing is published about what week one does.
Weeks 2-4
Four weeks is about the shortest honest window for a daily botanical. At two capsules a day that is most of a bottle, which makes it a natural checkpoint: you will be deciding whether to reorder anyway.
No trial of this formula exists to compare against.
Weeks 4-8
The seller’s own listing says most buyers waited three to six weeks. Take that as a description of expectation, not of effect, and note that a refund window of unknown length is running somewhere inside it.
The window runs from purchase, not from your first capsule.
After 8 weeks
If nothing has changed after two months of daily use, that is an answer. It is also the point at which a clinician is a better use of the money, particularly if what you are chasing is energy, strength or a hormone level.
MedlinePlus: too much or too little of a certain hormone can be serious.
No timeline is published for SodaPeak as a policy, no trial of it exists, and this site publishes no buyer testimony to draw a curve from. So instead of a graph, this is a plan: settle the dose question in week one, four weeks to a first fair look, eight weeks to a decision, and a refund window of unknown length running somewhere inside all of it.
At two capsules a day one bottle is exactly thirty days, which makes the reorder decision and the first fair look land on the same date. Use that. Write down on day one which end of the label’s range you chose and the one thing you would want to be different at four weeks. Memory is generous to things we paid for, and a sentence you wrote before you started is the only honest comparison available. The week-by-week page →
Straight answer
No. SodaPeak is a real product with a named distributor on the label, a real seller, a real phone number and a published returns address in Long Island City. Sodapeakcare sells it, and yes, it is for sale here — every buy button on this site goes to one order page.
The question is asked constantly in this category, and it has earned the asking. This is the market NIH’s Office of Dietary Supplements warns about by name: products sold for exercise and athletic performance that may contain unlabeled stimulants, steroids or hormone-like ingredients. It is also a market with no prices on product pages, refund windows that are pointed at rather than stated, and invented five-star reviews.
So rather than tell you we are different, here are four things you can check in under five minutes, on this site or on any other:
We would rather you buy nothing than buy from a page that fails those four checks, including this one.
Buying
Through the order page on this site. Sodapeakcare describes itself as a USA Authorized Retailer, holds stock and sells it in the United States. Orders ship from inside the US and a tracking number arrives in the order email.
We cannot tell you what is in a bottle bought somewhere else — not because we doubt every reseller, but because a lot number is only traceable by the company that shipped it, and a refund route only works through the desk that took the order.
The side panel prints an expiry date of 07-2028, and the pack says the lot and best-before are also on the base when the bottle carries them. The lot we hold is SOD-26/SO-7263 and the certificate reference is SOD-7263-26-SO. Both are reference codes rather than lab results, and the batch page says so in its first paragraph.
Check the safety seal before anything else. The label is explicit: do not use it if the seal is damaged or missing.
Buyers
The seller publishes a score and some counts. We publish those as the seller’s, and we do not publish the eight named buyers at all.
The seller’s figures, not ours
The pack we were given lists eight buyers by first name, age and city. <strong>Five of those eight carry the same sentence word for word</strong>, down to the phone number inside it, and two more share a second. Eight people did not independently write two sentences. That is layout copy with names typed over it, and publishing it as testimony would be inventing customers. So this page carries none of it, and the structured data on this site contains no rating.
How we source a factThe honest section
Six questions the order desk gets, answered as they were asked. We agree with all six.
No. The capsule shell is gelatin and the blend contains orchic substance, both printed on the label and both animal-derived. The seal on the packaging is wrong, and it is the first thing we would ask the seller to correct.
Correct, and the bottle is right. Orchic substance and boron amino acid chelate are on the Supplement Facts panel and in no marketing image. We publish all eight.
Eight ingredients in unknown proportions. The panel lists them in descending order by weight, so horny goat weed is the largest share and boron the smallest, and that is the whole of what the word proprietary leaves you.
Nothing on this label claims that, and US law would not permit it. The blend’s name points that way; its printed claims do not. NIH’s Office of Dietary Supplements finds no scientific support for the ingredients usually sold on that promise.
Because none was supplied to us. Estimating one and having you charged something else at checkout would be worse than saying so.
We do not know, and that is not a satisfying answer. The pack says “as printed on the listing”, and adds that this is often the marketplace return window, which is the platform’s policy rather than the seller’s. Read it where you pay and screenshot it.
Refunds
There is a money-back seal on the packaging. The supplied pack says the guarantee is “as printed on the listing”, and adds in brackets that this is “often the marketplace return window”. No number of days is given anywhere. That bracket matters: a marketplace return window is the platform’s policy rather than the seller’s promise, and the two are not always the same length. Read it on the listing before you pay, and screenshot it with the date showing.
The website desk at [email protected] cannot see orders and cannot process a refund. Use the phone line.
Refunds are credited 3 to 5 business days after the order desk approves them, then 5 to 10 days for the card to post it.
Return postage is the buyer’s, and the window runs from purchase rather than from your first capsule. Both are normal for this category, and both are worth knowing before you buy six bottles.
The bracket in the supplied pack is the part to notice: the guarantee is “as printed on the listing”, and that is “often the marketplace return window”. A platform return window is the platform’s policy. It can be shorter than a satisfaction guarantee, it can have conditions a guarantee would not, and it belongs to the marketplace rather than to the seller. Read it where you pay, screenshot it with the date visible, and keep it with the order email.
The honest section
Eight marks out of ten, averaged. 4.0 is a low score, and it is low for a specific reason: the label is better than the paperwork around it.
| What we scored | Mark | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Label transparency | 5/10 | A real Supplement Facts panel with a declared 1200 mg blend, eight ingredients named, a species for six of them and a plant part for six. That is well above this category. It stops at the word “proprietary”, and two of the eight appear in no marketing material at all. |
| Agreement between label and marketing | 2/10 | The label names eight ingredients; every marketing image names six. A vegetarian seal sits on packaging whose own panel prints gelatin and an animal-derived glandular ingredient. Those are two separate contradictions on one product, and both favour the marketing. |
| Dosing clarity | 5/10 | A printed instruction with a glass of water, which is more than many labels give. But it is a range - one or two capsules - and the panel’s serving is two, so the 1200 mg figure only describes half the range. |
| Strength for the category | 4/10 | 1200 mg is a large blend total by the standards of this category, and it is still one number split eight ways with no split published. Saw palmetto trials use a standardised extract; nobody can tell how much of one is in here. |
| Price clarity | 2/10 | No pack price was supplied to us at all. Every figure on this site reads “at checkout”, which is the weakest position a buyer can shop from. |
| Money-back window | 3/10 | A money-back seal is printed on the packaging, and the pack says the guarantee is “as printed on the listing (often the marketplace return window)”. A platform return window is not a seller’s promise, and no length is given. |
| Support and contact | 9/10 | A US phone line, a website email with published hours, a named office and a separate returns address. Most supplements in this category publish far less. |
| Published evidence for this formula | 2/10 | No trial of this blend has been published. Of the eight ingredients, exactly one has a federal consumer page - and that page reports little or no benefit for the use it is best known for. |
E-E-A-T
Sodapeakcare publishes this website. We sell this product, and we earn money when an order is placed through this site. That belongs near the top rather than in small type at the bottom, because everything else here should be read with it in mind.
Pages are written and reviewed by the SodaPeak Editorial Desk, which is a team rather than a person. No individual doctor or reviewer is named on this site. That is deliberate: naming a clinician we could not verify would be worse than naming none, and we apply exactly the same standard to the “doctor formulated” seal on this packaging, which we call unsupported on the testing and quality page.
The eight named buyers. The review block supplied to us lists eight people by first name, age and city. Five carry the same sentence word for word, down to the phone number inside it, and two more share a second. That is layout copy with names typed over it. The seller’s own score and counts appear on our reviews page, labelled as the seller’s; the names do not appear at all, and there is no rating in this site’s structured data.
A price. None was supplied. We could have written a plausible one and let checkout correct it. Every price on this site says “at checkout” instead.
A number of guarantee days. The pack points at the listing and gives no length. We could have written “60 days”, because that figure appears in passing inside the same review block we rejected. We did not, for the same reason.
A six-ingredient list. Every image we were given names six. Copying them would have made this site look tidier and would have left out an animal-derived ingredient that changes who can take the product. We publish eight.
Sources
Every source above is a government or national-body page, opened and read on September 22, 2026. None of them studied SodaPeak. We cite organisation pages rather than individual trials so you can check each one in a single click, and we do not print study identifiers we have not opened. Six of this product’s eight ingredients have no federal consumer page at all, and where that is so this site cites nothing rather than reaching for a weaker source.
Questions
SodaPeak is a dietary supplement sold as a capsule, 60 capsules to a black bottle. The front label reads “VITALIFES / SUPPORTS HEALTHY MUSCLE* / SodaPeak / ADVANCED FORMULA / 60 capsule / DIETARY SUPPLEMENTS”. The Supplement Facts panel declares a 1200 mg Test Boost Proprietary Blend of eight ingredients.
Because the marketing and the label disagree. The seller’s pack, the “Inside SodaPeak” card and the “How SodaPeak Works” card all name six botanicals. The Supplement Facts panel names those six plus orchic substance and boron amino acid chelate. The label is the regulated document, so this site publishes all eight.
No. A vegetarian seal appears in the packaging artwork, but the label’s own other-ingredients line ends “Gelatin Capsule”, and the blend contains orchic substance, which is animal glandular tissue. Both are animal-derived and both are printed in plain sight on the panel.
Eight ingredients, in the order the panel prints them: horny goat weed extract (Epimedium sagittatum) leaf, tongkat ali powder (Eurycoma longifolia Jack) root, saw palmetto extract (Serenoa repens) fruit, nettle extract (Urtica dioica L.) root, wild yam extract (Dioscorea opposita) root, sarsaparilla (Smilax glabra Roxb.) root, orchic substance, and boron amino acid chelate.
Not published. “Proprietary Blend” means the manufacturer declares one total instead of eight amounts. US rules allow it, provided the ingredients are listed in descending order by weight - which tells you horny goat weed is the largest share and boron the smallest, and nothing more.
The label allows either, and that is genuinely unhelpful. Two capsules is the serving the 1200 mg figure describes and makes the bottle a 30-day supply; one capsule is half that on both counts. Pick one and stay with it, and call the order desk on +1 (302) 200-3480 if you want the seller’s own answer.
Nothing on this label claims that. The blend is named a Test Boost blend, which points at testosterone, but every printed claim on the bottle is a structure/function claim about muscle, and US law would not allow a hormone claim. NIH’s Office of Dietary Supplements finds no scientific support for the ingredients usually sold on that promise.
For most healthy adults the named ingredients are common in supplements. The honest problem is that only one of the eight has a federal consumer page, so for the other seven there is no plain-language safety summary to read. The bottle’s own caution names pregnant and nursing mothers, children under 18 and anyone with a known medical condition.
No pack price was supplied to us. Every price on this site reads “shown at checkout”, and the marketplace listing is where the figure you will actually be charged appears.
The packaging carries a money-back seal, and the supplied pack says the guarantee is “as printed on the listing”, adding that this is often the marketplace return window. No length was given to us, so we do not print one. A marketplace return window is the platform’s policy rather than the seller’s promise, which is worth knowing before you rely on it.
Because five of the eight named buyers in the material supplied to us say the same sentence word for word, down to the phone number inside it, and two more share a second. The seller’s own published figures are on our reviews page, labelled as the seller’s, and nothing is presented as testimony.
52 questions are answered on the full FAQ page, in six groups.
Capsules, 60 capsules a bottle, 30 servings at the panel’s two-capsule serving, and a 1200 mg blend of eight named ingredients. Prices and the money-back window are printed on the listing, and the order desk is on +1 (302) 200-3480. Read the vegetarian section first — the capsule shell is gelatin, and that is the one thing worth being sure about before you pay.
Price and money-back window on the listing · ships from inside the US · order desk +1 (302) 200-3480